Why US-China Policy Is So Dangerous
Posted by Author on May 24, 2010
By D. J. McGuire, co-founder of the China e-Lobby and the author of “Dragon in the Dark: How and Why Communist China Helps Our Enemies in the War on Terror” –
Last week, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Michael Posner discussed human rights with representatives of the Chinese regime, and in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s labor camps, one-child policy, and indiscriminate imprisonment of political prisoners, Assistant Secretary of State Michael Posner apologized for an Arizona state law on immigration.
The Obama administration has entered new territory in regard to its policy toward the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The new way of doing things is mind-boggling, sickening, and outrageous (and lest anyone think I’m being partisan, Obama’s ambassador to the CCP—Jon Huntsman, who was in on the self-hate fest, was formerly the Republican governor of Utah). However, it is also very, very dangerous for several reasons. They are as follows.
It risks further harm on the political prisoners themselves: One comment I will always carry with me is from a speech Richard Gephardt gave when he declared his opposition to permanent free trade with the CCP. He talked about how sensitive the cadres were to outside criticism, so much so that the prisoners themselves could gauge how much flak the Party was getting—the more critics chirped, the nicer the guards were. Nonsense like this makes the cadres think they have a free hand to do whatever they’d like to their opponents behind bars—and when Chinese Communist hands are that free, they usually end up very bloody.
It demoralizes and confuses current dissidents: Does anyone think Hu Jia would be that upset over Arizona’s attempt to battle illegal immigration? Think about it, an Arizona cop might ask Hu to show his green card if he’s pulled over while driving within the state. Cadres in Henan Province let as many as 1 million people die of AIDS and had Hu arrested for trying to expose them. How about Chen Guangcheng? The regime imprisoned and beat him for helping women violently abused by cadres enforcing the one-child policy. Don’t get me started on Falun Gong, independent Christians, or Hanyuan County.
What this nonsense out of Washington does is make these victims feel completely ignored by the one nation that should remember their plight. This will make it much harder for them to help the Chinese people take back their country.
It gives the CCP international prestige that it will use to enslave more people. After all, if the Chinese Communist Party is the same as the Arizona legislature, what’s the big deal about the erosion of freedoms in Hong Kong? Or the invasion of Taiwan, should it happen (and I am increasingly convinced that it will)?
My last point doesn’t deal with Arizona, but rather the larger context, which, as Jay Nordlinger ruefully notes, included American apologies about “crime, poverty, homelessness, and racial discrimination.”
These comments reveal an appalling ignorance of reality in Communist China. Lest anyone forget, the Chinese Communist Party member card is a license to steal. Outside of the Potemkin cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Shenzhen), China is mired in a poverty unimaginable in the United States. Millions are “relocated” due to land seizures by corrupt cadres. As for racial discrimination, try being a Korean in Communist China—actually, on second thought, don’t.
In the end, it all points to one thing: the Chinese Communist Party no longer has any reason to take America seriously. This will have catastrophic repercussions, be it with Taiwan (as mentioned), our enemies in Afghanistan and Iraq (who have been past receivers of Communist support), the “mullahcracy” in Iran (long the CCP’s best friend in the Middle East), North Korea, or anywhere else.
Meanwhile, there was no mention of the long arm of lawlessness interfering with Chinese-Americans trying to exercise their political rights in this country, although this dangerous combination of repression and espionage has been unchallenged by administrations in both political parties.
CCP-watchers have long since gotten used to disappointments in Washington. No one who remembers the Clinton or Bush administration was completely shocked when Obama went the “engagement” route. However, this president has been far more obsequious to Beijing than any other, and given the ambassador’s behavior, Obama’s political opposition is hardly without blame.
There will come a time when the American people will demand a bona fide anti-Communist president, and (s)he will help bring down the CCP, but that future looks more expensive and, quite frankly, much bloodier today than it did even last week.
D.J. McGuire is co-founder of the China e-Lobby and the author of “Dragon in the Dark: How and Why Communist China Helps Our Enemies in the War on Terror.”
- Click to email (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)
This entry was posted on May 24, 2010 at 12:23 pm and is filed under China, News, Politics, Social, USA, World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
3 Responses to “Why US-China Policy Is So Dangerous”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.